Our Institutions

Function

The general function of any societal institution is to enable society to meet a class of needs of its members as well as possible via rational action and organisation.

The specific function of a particular societal institution is more complicated. Those deeply involved with the institution see needs in one way, while those primarily involved with other institutions see needs in their own terms.

Example: ClosedEducation

There is nothing new about social needs. But there is something new about a society being organized to meet those. Traditional and autocratic societies, that is to say those committed to the authoritarian politics of privileged pluralism, do not grow societal institutions. In many cases, their population subsists in a semi-starved state left to their own devices.

Meeting needs is the enlightened goal of politics. So institutions only emerge with political maturation. Their evolution depends on individual initiative within a legally supportive environment. The details of an institution's development is a product of many factors including:

• knowledge of the issues
• trial-and-error
• risk-taking
• scientific development
• disciplined awareness
• everyday observation
• systematic investigation
• self-regulation
• government support.

ClosedMore...

The emergence of institutions was facilitated by the scientific revolution of the 17th Century, and particularly by the enlightenment of the 18th Century. Society made a memorable shift once the equality of citizens under the law was established. It powered ahead once it was widely realized that progress would more surely come from applying reason rather than deferring to authority, no matter how benign.

Institutional growth does not occur in a straight line. The pull of elites and vested interests to shape institutions to serve their own interests rather than the public's needs never vanishes. For example, monopolies are known to generally act against the public interest and yet governments in liberal democratic societies repeatedly assign monopolistic powers to favoured businesses.

Examples

The following institutions, alphabetically listed, are recognizable in modern societies:

Given their origin in a cluster of entities, institutions are liable to split if one section becomes so important, complex and specialized that it develops its own culture. For example, it could be argued that «finance» is a distinct institution within «the economy».

ClosedSee Institutional Components:

This table is offered to illuminate and does not attempt to be complete, especially in regard to components. Some entities may be part of more than one institution. Societies will vary.

ClosedWhy Isn't «The Family» an Institution?

«The Family» can only be labeled as an institution in the non-taxonomic sense of the term. That is to say: the family is the customary way to live and to rear children. As an arena, the difference is stark.

In THEE, the Family-Household is a distinct Arena (Q1), more foundational and simpler in operation than Societal Institutions (Q4). In any society, the «Family-Household» arena is realized in millions of actual cases, but there are only a handful of societal institutions, one health system, one educational system etc. The similarity of these two Arenas is evident in that they share a quadrant in the PH'5Q Arenas TET.

As explained in the account of origins and illustrated in the above ClosedTable, societal institutions are systems constructed around the interactions of a core of well-known major organisations or associations including governmental entities. This core is surrounded by a periphery of many, at least hundreds and usually thousands or tens of thousands smaller organised bodies. However, membership is ultimately based on most if not all members of society, who are the human resource base for staffing all those bodies.

Significance of each Member

Every member of society is affected by the performance of each societal institution as a whole, although any single engagement is mediated by specific bodies within it. Despite disagreements on methods and outcomes, every member has an interest, usually a vested interest, and therefore wishes to influence the overall operation to be better served. That requires time and effort: it is work and deserves to be recognized as such, even if payment is often or usually not appropriate.

The expectation that a community or society should be organised so as to meet -personal-communal needs arises spontaneously in every person unless they are sociopaths.

At a society level, neglect could be due to an individualism that puts personal gain over common welfare (as in USA); or due to a regime that ruthlessly beats its subjects into passive acceptance (as in Russia).

While all citizens can sense and uphold values and expectations of institutional service. Many, given a favourable social milieu, can do more: publicizing careful descriptions of failures, making intelligent criticisms of performance, analysing problems and suggesting possible improvements, creating businesses and charitable bodies to meet gaps.

Q: Why not leave it to government, regulators or the main organisations?
ClosedA:


Originally posted: 14-Nov-2022. Last amended: 19-Mar-2024.